7 vs. Wild Season 2: Fritz Meinecke comments on criticism of the balancing system
A video arrived a few days ago 7 vs Wild Season 2 online, which has upset some fans. In it, Fritz Meinecke explains that there is a balancing system will give. This also means that not every participant is allowed to take the same number of items with them. To the criticism from the fan base he now expresses himself in a separate video.
7 vs. Wild season 2: “Everything stays as it is”
Right at the beginning of the video, Fritz Meinecke makes it clear that despite the criticism of the system nothing changed becomes. Nevertheless, he rises some arguments one that came up most often and makes his point of view clear.
It’s too difficult/dangerous: One of the most common arguments was that it was too difficult and most would give up after the first two days. Fritz counters that his team has been with the for a long time planning has spent.
Both the place and the system around the objects is well thought through. Also, it would be him personally with seven items too easy been, he missed the thrill. That was for emergencies Rescue team significantly enlargedto ensure the safety of participants.
The comparability is gone: If the candidates are allowed to take a different number of items with them, they can no longer compare with each other. Meinecke specifically says that the comparability in season two generally difficult is because the levels of experience vary greatly.
No content without items: Fewer items means participants have fewer opportunities to interact. Fritz Meinecke sees it here exact opposite. He recalls the last season:
All that content brought were the moments when something had to be built, because the corresponding item was missing. Be it a bed, a tarp, collecting junk to build things. That was what was most interesting for the viewers.
7 vs. Wild Season 2: item system explained, this is allowed
Different balancing: Many have one different kind of balancing suggested such as having some with minus points in the challanges walk. Here Meinecke replies that the point system is an additional but secondary incentive be. The candidates are there to test their limits. The prize money and the placement at the end must first be considered in the background.
What do you say to the statement? Do you have any ideas what could have been done differently? What is your opinion on the different points? Write it in the comments!
Reference-www.playcentral.de